Jason Day: Burner super fast vs rbz

Which is longer???

Haha.. burner 2.0 is longer than the newer rbz...

this is what TM is all about..

http://www.mygolfspy.com/mygolfspy-taylormade-kingdom-sldr-loftup/

Wondering what Jason shld be amazed by when half a year back he knew his burner was longer liao

Lol

Thanks for e post. insight indeed.

Bro turbo

Wat do u think of these two commercials?

Oh, manz! I should have bought this one instead of Stage II ...    

Daztasiumz wrote:

Bro turbo

Wat do u think of these two commercials?

I think Adidas-TM is gonna run out of marketing gimmicks very soon ...  

I guess the basis for comparison can only be made if the drivers are tested at the same time.

Between the period of hitting these 2 drivers, could he have undergone a swing change or his swing speed might have reduce which resulted in his Rbz distance lesser than the burner?

smokey wrote:

I guess the basis for comparison can only be made if the drivers are tested at the same time.

Between the period of hitting these 2 drivers, could he have undergone a swing change or his swing speed might have reduce which resulted in his Rbz distance lesser than the burner?

May be he was younger than and hence, higher swing speed ...  

Turbo wrote:

Oh, manz! I should have bought this one instead of Stage II ...    

Wic one?

Burner super fast 2.0?

330+ yards leh

Turbo wrote:

smokey wrote:

I guess the basis for comparison can only be made if the drivers are tested at the same time.

Between the period of hitting these 2 drivers, could he have undergone a swing change or his swing speed might have reduce which resulted in his Rbz distance lesser than the burner?

May be he was younger than and hence, higher swing speed ...  

Older ?? True

But rbz suppose to compensate the yards back leh + 17???

Daztasiumz wrote:

Turbo wrote:

Oh, manz! I should have bought this one instead of Stage II ...    

Wic one?

Burner super fast 2.0?

330+ yards leh

I am currently using RBZ Stage II ... At that time I was deciding R1 or RBZ Stage II ... I bought the latter because it gave me more distance and more stable when I cranked it real hard ...  

Daztasiumz wrote:

Turbo wrote:

smokey wrote:

I guess the basis for comparison can only be made if the drivers are tested at the same time.

Between the period of hitting these 2 drivers, could he have undergone a swing change or his swing speed might have reduce which resulted in his Rbz distance lesser than the burner?

May be he was younger than and hence, higher swing speed ...  

Older ?? True

But rbz suppose to compensate the yards back leh + 17???

As I said earlier, this is marketing gimmick ... TM has strong & successful marketing campaigns ...

Bro turbo 

U notice the tp logo on the rbz,??

Maybe smaller head lesser cc that's why shorter than the older super fast 2.0

Rbz days .. Jason got married and bought a Hse right?