Maruman user here...

Finally I received my Majesty irons! Very nice.

kissthegreen wrote:

Turbo wrote:

Yes, the FW user-friendly ... I like the flat, sleek and aerodynamic head design ...

the only 'complaint' that I have personally for Maruman woods is that they tend to have a large sole design as a result. Just not used to it.

I notice that the Maruman Fairway Wood has wider sole than most other fairway wood of other brands. Just wondering why?

grwilliam wrote:

kissthegreen wrote:

Turbo wrote:

Yes, the FW user-friendly ... I like the flat, sleek and aerodynamic head design ...

the only 'complaint' that I have personally for Maruman woods is that they tend to have a large sole design as a result. Just not used to it.

I notice that the Maruman Fairway Wood has wider sole than most other fairway wood of other brands. Just wondering why?

You are referring to the current Maruman FW S4000 the head are larger, I had a 3wd used few time sold off, no matter how hard I hit cant reach 180-200 yds, but my old Shuttle F can easily go further.

How much is the Maruman 3Wood?

I am looking for a Maruman 2 Wood actually.

I previously use Macgregor Mactec NV-NXL (JDM) and found them to be wonderfully light and accurate. 

Just for fun I bought the following:

Maruman Shuttle Irons i3000AR (Ladies) #7,#8,#9,#P,#A,#S Review
- More forgiving than my Mactecs. For the same #7 iron distance, I can touch 115m vs 100-110m for my Mactec. Ball flight is lower than my Mactecs.

Maruman Conductor Vino U5 (Ladies)
- Extremely easier to launch ball high and far. Super forgiving and more accurate compared to the MACTEC U5. However, I prefer my Mactec U5 as the ping sounds so much nicer than the Maruman. 

Maruman Conductor Vino W7 and W4 (Ladies)
- Really bad at my woods. So cant comment too much on these. 

Will play more once I get my PC.