Flight Scope vs Trackman

Can anyone tell me what the main difference is?

Impressed with the new Flightscope X2... Wireless and can use iPhone or iPad...
Looks quite portable... can bring to range to try

trackman still need PC/laptop?

mizzy wrote:

trackman still need PC/laptop?

Think so... But Trackman has a range of products that is also interesting...

They have the Trackman Pro & Trackman Range

Trackman Pro is the one that still needs a laptop/pc...
Trackman Range is for driving ranges... Its a complete system setup in a each bay

you buying one to put at ur Palm Oil Plantation?

eiji wrote:

you buying one to put at ur Palm Oil Plantation?

Wahahaha... No Way!!!
Why waste useful land for a "range" when i can make $$$ from planting some trees

Save the World!!!
Tree Hugger Aw is my new "hero"

JonL_TK wrote:

mizzy wrote:

trackman still need PC/laptop?

Think so... But Trackman has a range of products that is also interesting...

They have the Trackman Pro & Trackman Range

Trackman Pro is the one that still needs a laptop/pc...
Trackman Range is for driving ranges... Its a complete system setup in a each bay

but not wireless and not so portable i reckon?

i like the ipad thingy!

wonder how much is the flightscope ?...maybe like USD 15,000 ?

The normal flight scope is going for around US$9,000

I use both ... Flighscope and trackman both are indoor. felt the trackman was more accurate on distance and ball flight.

Thanks CYP... Just out of curiosity... When you say the Trackman is more accurate on distance and ball flight, how do you determine that especially if its indoor!!!

I usually just take the readings with a pinch of salt because outdoor conditions will vary

Came across the below article, and remembered this post


http://johngrahamgolf.com/blog/trackman-flightscope-2/

JonL_TK wrote:

Thanks CYP... Just out of curiosity... When you say the Trackman is more accurate on distance and ball flight, how do you determine that especially if its indoor!!!

I usually just take the readings with a pinch of salt because outdoor conditions will vary

I experience both last month on the same shop the same day with the same day

DISTANCE: I feel like the distance in trackman was real one that the flightscope giving 20 m short even i smoke it ... even pro of the shop say the same

BALL FLIGHT: ball fligh direction was the same

LAUNCH : i feel like with flighscope it always seem oo launch lower, for example over 10 ball with decen swing was lauching 12.8 with tracman but only 8.5 with flightcope... that average over 10 ball

Spin: spin calculated was a bit off with flight scope like 500- 100 rmp ...


i just think tracman is the number one ...

i have done extensive testing before i lay eyes on the trackman. Used Zelocity, golf achiever, Flightscope and Vector.

the new flightscope has some very nice features which makes it very attractive. bring both to the range and you will find out why Trackman is more accurate.

The FS has a tendency to under estimate because of the radar and software capabilities but it may also be due to the database that exist in the system.

for club fitting and consistent data thats linked to the industries' standard , i would still recommend you know what....

DGman