|
| Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? | |
|
+5Duval_S pushslice Lee36328 dmateo solarpop 9 posters | Author | Message |
---|
solarpop Senior Golfer
Posts : 390 Join date : 2009-06-22
| Subject: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:59 am | |
| I kinda had a light bulb moment at the range today. About halfway through my bucket of balls, i told myself that i would only hit intentional fades or draws. I was quite surprised to find that i was actually more accurate than when i was just trying to hit it straight...
So i've often heard that the straight shot is the hardest shot in golf. I understood this phrase as saying that it's very difficult not to impart any side spin on the ball, which i totally agree. Today i realized that it's also saying that it's actually easier to just decide what shot shape i want, have that mental picture, then execute it from the setup onwards; as opposed to setting up for a straight shot and trying to execute it.
We often hear commentators mention during golf tournaments about the pros' stock shot. I always assumed that this stock shot referred to the player's natural tendency. Now i think it could mean that it's the shot shape that the player is most comfortable with executing. Subtle, but important, difference - since it means that the player is intentionally executing the shot instead of just trying to hit it normally and accepting whatever shape the ball decides to take.
Anyway, based on this little epitome, i've decided that never again will i attempt to "hit it straight".
Thanks for reading my little rant.. Comments anyone? If you think i'm spouting rubbish please feel free to express your views.
Btw, my "stock shot" is a baby fade.
| |
| | | dmateo Super Active Golfer
Posts : 1104 Join date : 2010-09-19 Location : Singapore
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:10 am | |
| Heard on Golf channel sometime ago that the trend in the tour now is to not shape the shot and hit it straight. Which explains tigers comment when he said he is not used to hit it straight. but yeah, to me all shape are still difficult and I'm not at the level to say that I will draw/fade it. So I'm sticking to straight for now | |
| | | Lee36328 Super Active Golfer
Posts : 1997 Join date : 2011-03-27
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Fri Sep 09, 2011 10:05 am | |
| It makes good sense,
Set up to hit straight - mishit could be a draw or a fade - potential for a two-way miss.
Set up to hit fade or draw - mishit could be a straight shot, not so bad.
Trying to hit it straight, with a potential for getting a draw or a fade, puts both side of the fairway or green into play.
Trying to hit a stock fade or stock draw, takes one side of the green or fairway out of play. This is obviously very useful when there is a hazard on one side of the fairway or green.
BTW, a baby fade is a highly effective shot shape onto the green because it will bite better than a draw or a straight shot. | |
| | | pushslice Caddy
Posts : 5606 Join date : 2009-12-26
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Fri Sep 09, 2011 10:33 am | |
| Lee, not that simple lah. It still depends on your ability to execute
Try to hit fade, miss you can also pull it or slice it big
Try to hit draw, miss you can also push or hook it big
But i understand what solarpop is saying, provided a person can reliably execute his favored shot.
| |
| | | Duval_S Hall of Fame Golfer
Posts : 8185 Join date : 2009-06-19
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Fri Sep 09, 2011 10:39 am | |
| I will rather say ' Shot predictability leads to better accurancy'
| |
| | | Lee36328 Super Active Golfer
Posts : 1997 Join date : 2011-03-27
| | | | solarpop Senior Golfer
Posts : 390 Join date : 2009-06-22
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:22 am | |
| Just to be clear, i'm not talking about huge 30-yard draw shots or stuff like that. Mini draws or fades that's all, as opposed to a dead straight ball flight. I'm not even talking about shot shaping to eliminate one particular side of the fairway, or to counter a crosswind. For some reason it just seems that much more difficult to take aim, align, set up and swing for a straight ball.
pushslice: a miss is a miss, doesn't matter if you're trying to fade or draw.. the ball will still be unpredictable. I'm pretty sure i can do a big time hook even if i'm setting up for a fade lol | |
| | | cwpei8888 Junior Golfer
Posts : 118 Join date : 2011-06-19
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:30 am | |
| for pro in most courses they will encounter dog-leg, down/up slope and tough holes location like hole 11. White Dogwood: Par Four, 505 yards (amen corner).
so when wind come into play, narrow fairway, hideous rough; the back-spin, rolls, carry and exact landing point even from tee box can be critical especially when approaching well-guarded holes.
i guess shot shaping is really crucial for tour-pro.
TW problem on bridgestone was he hit too straight. link below: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/06/tiger-woods-bridgestone-struggles_n_920168.html
| |
| | | Lee36328 Super Active Golfer
Posts : 1997 Join date : 2011-03-27
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:40 pm | |
| There is only one club path/face angle combination that will get the ball to fly straight at the intended target.
There is an infinite variation of club path/face angle combination that will get the ball to fade or draw, and still hit the target.
Ergo, it is a lot easier to hit with a slight draw or slight fade than a straight shot at the target.
| |
| | | Lee36328 Super Active Golfer
Posts : 1997 Join date : 2011-03-27
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Sat Sep 10, 2011 12:46 pm | |
| - Lee36328 wrote:
- There is only one club path/face angle combination that will get the ball to fly straight at the intended target.
There is an infinite variation of club path/face angle combination that will get the ball to fade or draw, and still hit the target.
Ergo, it is a lot easier to hit with a slight draw or slight fade than a straight shot at the target.
I found an interesting comment on this topic by Ben Hogan in an interview with Golf magazine. GOLF: How often have you ever tried to hit a ball dead straight? HOGAN: Never. GOLF: Never? HOGAN: Jesus Christ can't hit a golf ball straight. It's virtually impossible—at best it's an accident. Besides, you give yourself much more margin for error by maneuvering your shots one way or the other. Much more control. | |
| | | shorthitter Golf Professionals
Posts : 1725 Join date : 2009-06-17 Location : Laguna National Golf and Country Club
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:30 pm | |
| It was way different in Hogans day, Not as much if any Perimeter weighting on irons, and the balls made a different game.
Today the balls and clubs are designed to keep the ball in play. Reduce sidepin, fight the wind etc...
Shaping the ball as Hogan did is harder now.
| |
| | | dmateo Super Active Golfer
Posts : 1104 Join date : 2010-09-19 Location : Singapore
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:44 pm | |
| imagine if Hogan played today with todays equipment must be a blast.
| |
| | | Lee36328 Super Active Golfer
Posts : 1997 Join date : 2011-03-27
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:16 pm | |
| The interview continues... GOLF: The famous Hogan fade. How much did it really move from left to right? HOGAN: It depends, but on average just a few yards. It wasn't a big drift, even off the tee. Control is the main thing, and the tee shot is the most important shot in golf. You've got to hit the fairway before you have a good chance of putting the ball close to the pin. You can be the greatest iron player in the world, but if you're in the boondocks it won't do you any good. ====================================================== Quite easy for me to move a modern ProV1 ball just a few yards. What's more alarming, it's also very easy for me when aiming at the center of the range and flushing a shot, to move the ball all the way to the left of the range, albeit unintentionally. It would be an impressive draw if it were intentional. Never knew a modern ball can move so much until I moved away from perimeter weighted clubs. Workability of blades.... Now to get it under control... Interesting that Hogan said the tee shot is the most important shot in golf. "You can be the greatest iron player in the world, but if you're in the boondocks it won't do you any good." So, drive for dough, putt for dough then, eh? | |
| | | Cyp_PGA Super Active Golfer
Posts : 1143 Join date : 2009-11-11 Age : 35 Location : Gold Coast , QLD
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:52 pm | |
| I think shot shaping make you understand how the swing work and his fault ,but no more accurate . most course you play doesn't require to hit big draw and fade , exept maybe tanah merah , warren and sentosa.... | |
| | | naij Junior Golfer
Posts : 102 Join date : 2011-01-05
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Sat Sep 10, 2011 3:28 pm | |
| hey solarpop, what you've said is exactly what Jack Nicklaus believes is the right strategy to approach aiming at the target. Somewhere in his book "Golf My Way" from wayyy back.
From what Nicklaus wrote his concept is if the target is say.. left centre of the green, you shld aim 10yards right and attempt a draw, so if u execute perfectly it sticks to the pin, if you hit a perfect straight shot the ball shld land on the green just 10 yards right. That way you allow for 2 outcomes to occur out of a possible 3 outcomes, ie. straight + draw vs (unintentional) fade. In this situation because the pin is left centre, assuming you fade you wont shortside yourself and will hopefully have a decent chance to up and down? I think.
Not sure if I explained it accurately.. later the Golden Bear come and smack me. | |
| | | solarpop Senior Golfer
Posts : 390 Join date : 2009-06-22
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? Sun Sep 11, 2011 6:11 am | |
| All these Hogan and Nicklaus references are making me feel quite smart hahaha...
That said, just had a game today and applied my new mantra of "don't hit it straight". Can't say it helped me score better, coz my swing was quite off. It did help in making the set up easier though. Only once did i screw up big time, where i tried to tee off with a driver intending to hit a high fade - ended up with a nice perfect draw in the wrong direction. Ball ended up OB. | |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? | |
| |
| | | | Shot shaping leads to better accuracy? | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| Highlights |
Total Donation till date to Autism Association (SG): S$46,285
|
Latest topics | » 2024 LPGA Surprises & Disappointments by tonyj5 Sat Aug 03, 2024 1:11 am
» I miss all of you! by Technospaz Wed Jul 10, 2024 3:33 pm
» Nelly Korda Dominating the LPGA Tour! by tonyj5 Mon Apr 08, 2024 12:42 pm
» My Top 40 LPGA Player of the Year Predictions for 2024 by tonyj5 Thu Feb 22, 2024 6:33 am
» 2024 LPGA Priority List by tonyj5 Sat Jan 13, 2024 1:55 am
» Summing Up the 2023 LPGA Season by tonyj5 Sat Nov 25, 2023 3:08 pm
» LPGA Surprises & Disappointments - 2023 by tonyj5 Thu Sep 28, 2023 1:59 pm
» So You Think You Know the LPGA? by tonyj5 Sat Jul 22, 2023 12:56 pm
» LPGA Reshuffles 2023 Priority List by tonyj5 Fri May 26, 2023 12:30 am
» My Top 40 LPGA Player of the Year Predictions for 2023 by tonyj5 Fri Feb 24, 2023 4:01 am
» 2023 LPGA Priority List by tonyj5 Thu Jan 19, 2023 2:30 pm
» 2022: A Year to Remember in Women's Golf by tonyj5 Thu Dec 08, 2022 12:18 am
» Newbie Group by Golfiekid Mon Oct 10, 2022 11:19 am
» NSRCC Member List by Golfiekid Mon Oct 10, 2022 11:15 am
» As the LPGA World Turns - September 2022 by tonyj5 Sat Sep 24, 2022 12:42 am
» LPGA Player Profile: Brooke Henderson by tonyj5 Sun Aug 21, 2022 2:35 am
» 2022 LPGA Mid Season Rookie Report Card by tonyj5 Fri Jul 22, 2022 12:43 pm
» LPGA Surprises & Disappointments 2022 by tonyj5 Sat Apr 16, 2022 12:32 am
» Are the 2022 LPGA Rookies the Best Ever? by tonyj5 Sat Feb 05, 2022 12:44 am
» 2022 LPGA Priority List by tonyj5 Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:39 am
» OCC term member by h71y6 Tue Jan 04, 2022 8:48 pm
» OCC MGK Whatsapp Group by h71y6 Tue Jan 04, 2022 8:47 pm
» my golf kaki - Whatsapp group chat by h71y6 Tue Jan 04, 2022 8:46 pm
» handicap 20 golfer, OCC weekday term member looking for games by h71y6 Tue Jan 04, 2022 8:43 pm
» 2021: The LPGA Comes Roaring Back! by tonyj5 Sat Nov 27, 2021 12:07 am
» LPGA Tour 2021 - Surprises & Disappointments by tonyj5 Sat Jul 31, 2021 2:05 pm
» As the LPGA World Turns - June 2021 by tonyj5 Wed Jun 16, 2021 12:35 pm
» 2021 U.S. Women's Open Preview by tonyj5 Tue Jun 01, 2021 2:19 pm
» Are the Kordas Golf's Best Sister Act Ever? by tonyj5 Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:36 am
» How Good are the 2021 LPGA Rookies? by tonyj5 Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:19 pm
» 2021 LPGA Priority List by tonyj5 Mon Jan 18, 2021 12:29 pm
» What range do you usually go? by iron eagle Fri Dec 11, 2020 3:26 pm
» Youtube videos by rkangrah Wed Dec 09, 2020 5:17 pm
» 2020 U.S. Women's Open Preview by tonyj5 Wed Dec 09, 2020 2:07 pm
» Rolex Rankings Movers of the Year by tonyj5 Sat Oct 17, 2020 1:30 pm
» Ten LPGA Tournaments are in the Books by tonyj5 Wed Sep 16, 2020 2:02 pm
» As the LPGA World Turns by tonyj5 Tue Aug 11, 2020 2:11 pm
» LPGA to Restart Season at Invernes Club! by tonyj5 Thu Jun 18, 2020 12:04 pm
» LPGA to Resume its Schedule in Ohio by tonyj5 Fri May 29, 2020 3:47 pm
» LPGA Player Profile: So Yeon Ryu by tonyj5 Thu Mar 26, 2020 9:35 am
» How Big an Impact Will the Coronavirus Have on the LPGA? by tonyj5 Mon Mar 23, 2020 3:48 pm
» New Seletar Golf Course by youming Tue Feb 18, 2020 11:27 pm
» Who Will Qualify for the 2020 Women's Olympic Golf Team? by tonyj5 Thu Jan 30, 2020 1:19 pm
» My Top 40 LPGA Player of the Year Predictions by tonyj5 Tue Jan 14, 2020 3:17 pm
» How Good are the 2020 LPGA Rookies? by tonyj5 Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:54 pm
|
|